<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Welcome to the Dragonflame &#187; security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dragonflame.org/tag/security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dragonflame.org</link>
	<description>ad astra per aspera</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:15:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Looking for the best antivirus software</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonflame.org/2010/08/23/looking-for-the-best-antivirus-software/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dragonflame.org/2010/08/23/looking-for-the-best-antivirus-software/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nightwind</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonflame.org/2010/08/23/looking-for-the-best-antivirus-software/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I found myself in need of a good antivirus product and as it&#8217;s been a while since my last incursion in the world of antivirus software, I decided to give a chance to the reports at www.av-comparatives.org. For those unfamiliar, this website provides periodical testing and reviews of antivirus products and I must say [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I found myself in need of a good antivirus product and as it&#8217;s been a while since my last incursion in the world of antivirus software, I decided to give a chance to the reports at <a href="http://www.av-comparatives.org">www.av-comparatives.org</a>. For those unfamiliar, this website provides periodical testing and reviews of antivirus products and I must say that after reviewing their methodology, I believe it to be the most comprehensive at the moment.</p>
<p> <span id="more-1096"></span>
<p>Of course, finding and comparing all the attributes one is looking for in an ativirus is something else. Thus, I had to dig deep in order to get a good look around but after doing so I was left with quite a few surprise results:</p>
<p>Norman AV: the mighty grandson of the famous Thunderbyte Antivirus is less than mediocre. It&#8217;s slow and although it has a fair detection rate, I can&#8217;t imagine the home user that would like to hog down his machine using this &#8230; thing</p>
<p>Symantec Antivirus: although I have a personal resentment versus this product, which used to be slow and give a lot of false-positives, I must say that things have improved here. However, I still won&#8217;t be using it.</p>
<p>ESET NOD32: this has always been a favorite of mine. However, I find that the price is a bit expensive and although the last time I tried it, it looked like a good and snappy piece of software, the latest tests show it to be just of average speed (although with a very very impressive detection rate)</p>
<p>Kaspersky AV: brilliant detection rates, however it&#8217;s quite heavy on resources. It has very good heuristics and healing capabilities and as a bonus it is backed by one of the best antivirus labs in the world. Still, it comes second to my preferences.</p>
<p>BitDefender: It would be great if it wasn&#8217;t one of the slowest antivirus software. Lot of options, great detection rates &#8230; but still. Often hanged my computer, so &#8230; no!</p>
<p>Avira!: A nice surprise comes from here, with the best overal detection rates (the best in on-demand scanning and third best in proactive protection). Very snappy and cheap on resources &#8230; with a very good price. My choice for now.</p>
<p>Microsoft Security Essentials: Microsoft has an incredibly poor security record as a company, a record that it&#8217;s Defender software packed with Windows didn&#8217;t do much to help. However, it seems that the acquisition of GeCad&#8217;s antivirus division has finally payed off as Microsoft Security Essentials is a little gem of an antivirus. Quite snappy and very good detection rates (best in proactive defense, not so good in on-demand).</p>
<p>For more details, please <a href="http://www.av-comparatives.org/" title="antivirus comparison">check this out</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dragonflame.org/2010/08/23/looking-for-the-best-antivirus-software/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

